引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 85次   下载 204 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
0
()
摘要:
关键词:  
DOI:
Received:July 21, 2017Revised:October 22, 2017
基金项目:
Research Progress of Landscape Evaluation
()
Abstract:
The theoretical basis, evaluation methods and advantages and disadvantages of four main theoretical schools were discussed in this paper based on a conclusion of development of landscape evaluation. At the same time, according to the evaluation of the different emphasis, the characteristics of 3 types of evaluation methods were concluded as follows: type 1 focused on the evaluation of the “scenery”, called a detailed description method or expert method; type 2 focused on the research of“feel” , called the public preference or participation of residents; type 3 focused on “scenery” and “feel”, called comprehensive quantitative method. From the aspects of national policy support, theoretical introduction and innovation, and domestic evaluation examples, this paper combined the exploration course of domestic landscape evaluation, and provided a reference for the establishment of landscape evaluation system and evaluation practice for the future.
Key words:  landscape evaluation; theoretical school; evaluation method

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫